On the number of nonseparating vertices in strongly connected in-tournaments
نویسنده
چکیده
A digraph without loops, multiple arcs and directed cycles of length two is called an in-tournament if the set of in-neighbors of every vertex induces a tournament. A local tournament is an in-tournament such that the set of out-neighbors of every vertex induces a tournament as well. Let p ≥ 2 be an integer and let T be a strongly connected tournament such that every vertex has at least p positive neighbors and at least p negative neighbors. In 2006, Kotani showed that T has at least k vertices x1, x2, . . . , xk, where k = min {|V (D)|, 4p− 2}, such that T − xi (i = 1, 2, . . . , k) is strongly connected. One year later, Meierling and Volkmann proved that the same proposition is valid for the class of local tournaments. In this paper we shall generalize the result to the class of in-tournaments, thereby generalizing Kotani’s as well as Meierling’s and Volkmann’s results. 1 Terminology and introduction All digraphs mentioned here are finite without loops and multiple arcs. For a digraph D, we denote by V (D) and E(D) the vertex set and arc set of D, respectively. The number |V (D)| is the order of the digraph D. The subdigraph induced by a subset A of V (D) is denoted by D[A]. By D−A we denote the digraph D[V (D)−A]. If A = {x} is a single vertex, then we write D − x instead of D − {x}. If xy ∈ E(D), then y is a positive neighbor of x and x is a negative neighbor of y, and we also say that x dominates y, denoted by x → y. If A and B are two disjoint subdigraphs of a digraph D such that every vertex of A dominates every vertex of B in D, then we say that A dominates B, denoted by A → B. The outset N(x) of a vertex x is the set of positive neighbors of x. More generally, for arbitrary subdigraphs A and B of D, the outset N(A,B) is the set of vertices in B to which there is an arc from a vertex in A. The insets N−(x) and N−(A,B)
منابع مشابه
Maximum Distance Between Slater Orders and Copeland Orders of Tournaments
Given a tournament T = (X, A), we consider two tournament solutions applied to T: Slater’s solution and Copeland’s solution. Slater’s solution consists in determining the linear orders obtained by reversing a minimum number of directed edges of T in order to make T transitive. Copeland’s solution applied to T ranks the vertices of T according to their decreasing out-degrees. The aim of this pap...
متن کاملThe number of C3-free vertices on 3-partite tournaments
Let T be a 3-partite tournament. We say that a vertex v is −→ C3 -free if v does not lie on any directed triangle of T . Let F3(T ) be the set of the −→ C3 -free vertices in a 3-partite tournament and f3(T ) its cardinality. In this paper we prove that if T is a regular 3-partite tournament, then F3(T )must be contained in one of the partite sets of T . It is also shown that for every regular 3...
متن کاملOn the maximum density of fixed strongly connected subtournaments
In this paper, we study the density of fixed strongly connected subtournaments on 5 vertices in large tournaments. We determine the maximum density asymptotically for three tournaments as well as extremal families for each tournament. We use Razborov’s semidefinite method for flag algebras to prove the upper bounds.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Australasian J. Combinatorics
دوره 44 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009